Karmic Balancer: Can Evil Be Eradicated? (Maelinhon)

The second part of the article about the role of people in karma: https://maelinhon.org/en/thinking-about-scumbags-the-roles-of-people-in-karma/

I recently received a funny letter without an answer, in which an anonymous reader asked me why I consider prostitution and slavery normal, and almost positive phenomena. I must admit, I don’t consider anything positive or negative in this world at all, but since I have such an opinion, let’s discuss it. How to treat bad people – we figured out. And how to treat the “bad things” in the world? Are you personally against war, disease, slavery, prostitution? Of course you are against it, ask anyone you want – everyone is against it! In their own eyes, everyone is a white fluffy creature with newborn kittens in their arms. But how does it happen that phenomena that literally everyone and everyone does not like (in words) continue to persist in reality for millennia? Is it possible to simply take and eradicate them once and for all? Defeat war, hunger, slavery?

I tell you: no. It is technically impossible. And first of all, this impossibility is directly connected with the energetic structure of the world itself. Mind your hands.

Any Western astrologer can be easily put on his back by a simple question – how do these planets of yours influence people? Where are the planets, and where are we? The fact is that our world is built in such a way that the planets create a flow of energy, which, “passing through dense layers of the atmosphere,” becomes an element. And from the element, the so-called metaphysical section is built – a set of all the “bricks” that this element has built. There is no phenomenon that would not have an elemental background, be it tangible or virtual. Even for non-existent phenomena, there is still an element. There are only 5 dense elements – Air, Wood, Water, Earth and Fire. And a planet entering degrees and signs tugs not your kidneys, but the entire section at once. Well, and the kidneys too. And each of these elements is divided into 2 polarities, creating a kind of global double-edged beam: any (any!!!) phenomenon of this world will be paired and will have an antipode and counterweight.

Masculine – Feminine, field – forest, sea – land, rational – irrational, yin – yang, feelings – thoughts, legal – illegal, authority – opposition. And billions of billions of other balance beams, the meaning of which we do not even see in everyday life. For example, dictatorship – shopping malls. Or socks – grass. Ice cream – arms sales. Prostitution – theaters. A balance beam is a polar thing, and if you remove the load from one end, the other will simply collapse, and in the conditions of a global victory over something, the other range of the cut also collapses globally. Note that not a single global ancient problem has ever been solved, and precisely for this reason. You can defeat a specific disease, but not diseases in general. You can take people out of slavery here and now, but not eradicate slavery as such. You can stop the war here and now, but not wars in general. Take away hunger, for example, and the level of civilization in general will collapse, take away war — people’s health will collapse, take away prostitution — money will collapse.

This happens because at the other end of the metaphysical slice there are phenomena that are familiar to you and quite positive, while the elements do not build only good or bad. And you can’t just ban or turn off part of the spectrum because you don’t like it. War — because Mars, but your heart beats “because Mars”. No war — no heart. No stupidity — no kidneys. And while you eat ice cream, the world invents a new machine for killing people.

The planetary slice is billions of phenomena and objects, numbers, colors, cardinal directions, textures and tastes, organs and systems… And the entire slice, with all its balance beams, is an endless chessboard, where there are the same positions that I wrote about in the article “Thoughts about bastards”. The whole world is literally a collection of cells that endlessly balance each other. Every phenomenon is inscribed in a cell, every cell is occupied by someone or something, and each one balances the other. And none of them can be empty, because then the essence of this chessboard is lost. Remove Bill from the cage, Bob will appear there in a day.

And that is precisely why I am unable to give any assessment to any phenomenon or person: if this person or phenomenon has taken a position and a cell, then there is something else at the other end of the spectrum that I may not know about. A person in slavery can support the life of an entire species of animals with his suffering. By the way, regarding Navalny and other opposition. Many say that Navalny is a fool and a showman. You see this from the primitive position of an ordinary person. But think about it from the position of metaphysics: there are authorities, like a large cell on a board, and there is an oppositionist who balances it. Here is your rocker! Who occupies the cell there and what kind of person it is is a completely unimportant question, this one will leave – another will come, the cell cannot be empty. It is much more interesting here not WHO, but what position he occupies. It happens that even a fool decides the fate of the world, being brought to an interesting cell. Let’s be honest: we simply feel sorry, imaginary or real, for those who have karmically fallen into cells, who are forced to starve, sell themselves, suffer and die in a terrible way. But if the very structure of cells and positions cannot be eradicated, then what’s the point of assessing it? There is no point.

There is another interesting postulate in people’s minds: “all women are idiots”. It is opposed by another postulate: “all men are assholes”. Translating it into an academic language, we can say that many people think that women are hysterical, stupid creatures, incapable of thinking with their heads in principle, and men are wooden blocks who feel nothing except the pressure of the ego somewhere in the codpiece area. An interesting thought, but fundamentally wrong. And, oddly enough, it grows from the same flowerbed as the issues of eradicating prostitution, and this question illustrates the problem of dualities as clearly as possible.

A human being is a creature, through which literally, in half, passes a section of the 6th element – Life. People have always lived and live “in half”, dividing from within into the yin (irrational, sensual, emotional and feminine) spectrum and the yang (leading, rational, open and logical). The human being himself is as if eternally crucified in two cells at once, stretched between them, and he still needs to find a partner for himself from this uncomfortable position!

Men feel, they can feel everything perfectly, and love, and care, and be tender, and write music, and create irrational, but sweet yin outrages. Women can think with their heads, solve problems and change reality perfectly. The question is in proportion and balance, so it seems strange to try to force women to live on yang, thinking with their heads and turning off their emotions. Otherwise, “what did you turn on the girl?” Or an attempt to raise a boy to be something amorphous and slobbering, who is only capable of whining and looking for help. But wars and measured cruelty = a counterweight to honor and masculine behavior, and a rocker on one side does not work (although society persistently tries to make it work, forbidding men to show emotions and teaching women to bear everything on themselves).

A person is already buried in this duality from birth, on which you still need to look for your own balance, from which you cannot cross out anything. You need to think with your head and experience feelings. And here it is – your notorious gender. Each person has their own, and we also look for partners based on balance: if a woman has 80% of yang behavior and energy, then men who have only 20% of it (and this lady simply won’t technically fit more) will be drawn to her, that is, weak and amorphous. Accordingly, in order for a man to find at least 60% of yin, he must not have it himself. Here, either take what is given, or change your behavior to find someone who will balance you. Remember about the balance of two loads and cells: we can build relationships only with those who balance us according to Qi, because 146% only happens during elections in Russia, living people always have exactly 100 polarities.

And so, knowing this scheme, questions are not so clear-cut, right? For example, why don’t we just stop fighting? Or stop selling people anywhere? And it is not so easy to wave a sword at the ready on the topic of feminism and other pampering. Interesting questions are also poured in here, like: Why is it that all of Ann’s men are wimps? Where have the true men, the brutal and strong personalities of “I said so” gone? Or, why does such a good Bill have no one? While Ann occupies a male position on the board, this cell is actually occupied, the person she needs will not squeeze in there. To occupy one, you need to free up another, to eradicate something, you need to prepare for the disappearance of its counterweight. And this is how true astrology works, and not these zodiacs of yours from the toilet-reading newspaper.

Why does it work this way? And why aren’t cars round? And aren’t the doors on the floor? No reason, it’s just how the engineers who conceived the system came up with it. If they had come up with it differently, it would have worked differently, but this is reality. And we can only put up with it and use the knowledge about it. Fighting a system where you yourself are constantly standing on the breaking point is not exactly heroism.

(c) Mylene Maelinhon / Material of the Marginal Metaphysics project

Translated by Schwarzenstern

When copying material or part of it, copyright and a link to the source are strictly required, otherwise it is punishable by law and I’m not talking about lawyers.